Sunday, 10 March 2013

'Instinct' - Sunday Scribblings - 10/3/2013

'Instinct'

This is the 200th. Post on Scandic Sequences!
My quirky instinct told me that I should
do something a little weird - maybe!

So :-

53 years ago Great Britain had a really good
song for the Eurovision Song Contest,
and a really good singer to sing it.

It became a favourite to win.  Back in 1960,
everything was 'live' on TV.  No pre-recordings, 
or fantastic stage productions; no colour; no dancers cavorting around, etc.  It was just the
singers on a simple stage, and the orchestra.

Singing order was drawn by ballot, and with
the international voting starting immediately
the last singer had finished, it was always an
advantage to be late in the draw.  The later
songs were obviously fresher in the juries
minds.

The French song, 'Tom Pilibi', performed by 
a pretty little French mademoiselle, was drawn
No.1    (bad luck!)

The British song, 'Looking High, high, high', and performed by the excellent Bryan Johnson,
was drawn to be performed last.
(Whoopee!)

What did the stupid Brits do?

In order to appear gentlemanly and fair
to the French teenager, they voluntarily 
swopped places, which meant that the
British number would go on first.

The result was that the French girl won the
contest, and the British song, with poor old 
Bryan Johnson came second.



There wasn't a great difference in the votes,
so had he sung last he almost certainly
would have 'wiped the floor' with
all opposition.

This has rankled with me for 53 years,
but my instinct tells me that none of
you could care less, one way or the other.





4 comments:

  1. Bonnie Tyler for the UK this year..doubt she can trump Bucks Fizz..

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suppose it doesn't mean that much to me (actually it doesn't) but I understand your feelings and frustrations with the judging..Two things,first I was only able to here a tiny tidbit of the lady but she was cute (that's important)and she had a nice voice. Second, the announcer was french...so I think the contest was rigged. Maybe the Brits were paid off (heaven forbid) or maybe they knew their boy didn't have a chance to they switched so they would have the proper excuse...after old chap..who's more honorable than the British

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can see whose side you would have been on at Agincourt. We love to hate each other. In the main the frogs don't play cricket so why do you think any contest with them is going to be gentlemanly. Did you expect them to refuse and say "Zee rules are zee rules, vee will go first"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would LOVE to be in Europe for Eurovision. They probably simulcast it on some expensive cable station, but we don't have anything but rabbit ears!

    My friend George goes on and on about Eurovision, and he did bring over a video montage of different countries, ranging from the cheesily dressed ensembles to some amazing voices. I think the whole idea is brill, and it's on my Bucket List to come across the pond and see it. (Yes, pathetic, I know, but I love campy shows.)

    I actually think it was nice of the Brits to swap with the little French girl. I know, I know, you probably draw blood over football and cricket matches, too!! Love, Amy
    http://sharplittlepencil.com/2013/03/11/goosebumps/

    ReplyDelete